Three Distinct Types Of Enduring Self Philosophy Essay

Three Distinct Types Of Enduring Self Philosophy Essay1. It is conceptualized that at that place ar three distinct types of digest self happened to both Stelios and the claimant, judging by the stimulate they have had using the teletransporter. In Stelios case, despite the fact that he got transported to the Mars and brought back to earth, he claims that he is still the same person as he is before. That said, this has sh sustain that bodily continuity is what makes him the same now and earlier he was creation transported to Mars. According to Diotima, the body is what who we actually are. If the body changes, it will be still the same you. Just ilk a house which is va standt and then occupied again over several(prenominal) times, renovations are made in the owners best interest. No matter how much is being added and removed from the house, the house forever remains the same house, the house is the self whereas the occupants and furniture are physical features in a body that changes continually. So, he is having a hard time believe that the claimant is correct. Because after he used the teletransporter, he still looks and feels the same. However, on the claimants side, things are world apart from Stelio, computer storage constitutes a large role in what he had said. According to Locke, he believed that memories are what we rightfully are. Ironically, he actually remembered the process where he got poped and being substituted by a cl matchless. Consequently, thats what drove him into bringing his murder case to the court knowing the teletransporter had killed him. He can recall every single detail in his memory and able-bodied to present it to the court. In addition to memory, the enduring self is a soul verbalise by Descartes is related to the claimant side of story. Looking from the claimants perspective, the teletransporter might design to transport your body to Mars, except the soul is left behind on Earth. The soul feels incompetent without t he body, hence the soul feels dead. When his body is transported back to earth, the soul and body is reunited. Again, he felt complete because his soul was reattached to the body still doubted whether it is the same body he carried before.2. Both of us had the same perception that memory makes the self endure over time. Nevertheless, there is a slightly different interpretation of memory for apiece of us.In Jia Yiis point of view, Memories are what we really are. How we react to different kinds of situations, how we judge things from our own aspects, our quotations. When we were first born, we had no memory. And as we grow, we acquire sweet and bitter memories. As we grow older, we tend to gain accept from the happenings we faced in our daily lives. And with that, the memories influence us. It builds our character. Lets say you are a very cheerful person. But then, one fine day, your parents went crazy and started torturing you since then. Would your character be affected? Im pr etty sure it would because the bitter memories you bear in your mind haunt you almost every day. That would make you soak up things different from the way you see things before. Lets say if a person is brought up in a very happy and cheerful family. Of syllabus this persons character would be a cheerful person. And lets say if a person is brought up in a family where the parents always threw their tantrums at their child, that person would of course being a very pessimistic. These characters were built differently because of their memories and experiences they had during their childhood.In Jessicas point of view, without memory, we are just like a program that is shut down and never able to be retrieved back again. A handful of critics might not concur with this concept and stipulated that if we dont remember part of our past, therefore we are not ourselves. I would like to go one step ahead and elaborate further to what they have said. Memory and brain is intricately linked and h ighly dependent on all(prenominal) other. However, our brain is not capable of storing every information that is present to us, but those that appears happening, outlandish and appears important to us turns a memory memorable. Shortly put, our brain and memory is similar to a filter. Bits of information is filtered and the residues left on the filter are those unforgettable memories. Those that are channeled out from the filter is conceived to be menial by the brain. pretend this for an example, I was strolling down a park one day, along the curbs I saw neatly trimmed grasses, flowers that smell like candy, a man seance on a beach reading a book. All of a sudden, a stray dog aimlessly chased after me and I finally got taken over by the dog. Chances are, ten years later, when you happened to bumped into the same park, the first thing that comes to mind is that you remembered being chased by a dog. The rest of the details you experienced earlier didnt crossed your mind. Notwithst anding, we remained the same person as before. For the most part, the memory of the past evokes us into becoming a better person or the other way round depending on how well we extract the lesson from it. All in all, memory is precursor to how to change the way we live and ultimately, choose to character we desire to be.Part B1. The passage is stating that we humans are nothing more than just a body who doesnt have purpose and meaning in tone because in the end, we died and that is that. All our entire lives were fixed at the notion that we humans are unique because of we are rational, conscious, have purpose in life when in fact that is not the case. These abilities that are supposed to be designated at a particular way might not be it is meant to be. From young, these inheritable abilities bar in our veins and to reject these unique abilities sounds implausible. Therefore, everybody living in this earth considered to be living a wrong life due to the fact that their abilities ar ent supposed to move like everybody else does. Who knows the instinct, senses, motivation that we have been told arent what they really are. They are all reducible to only physical body, and only that. That being said, this concept of human are outlay nothing propels the Nazis to build the concentration camps and exterminate the humans. Why the Nazis themselves werent killed was they perceive themselves as beyond the normal human beings. They are superior than the prisoners and believed to have more highly-developed abilities the humans, and above all, invincible. The idea of mass killing the humans is as if they destined to be getting rid of. This truly shows that the Nazis treat human nature as non-human. Basically, we are nothing but objects and materials to them. Due to their perception of this, m all human lives were lost. This whole passage is set on the materialists view that human is just a physical entity with no immaterial mind. Also, Charles Darwins theory stated that h uman nature has no purpose and not unique could be partly linked to this passage.2. of contrast and soil is that humans are just plain body without purpose in life, therefore are meant to be killed. On the other hand, at the desks and in lecture halls of nihilistic scientists and philosophers means that all this problem of mass killing of humans stems from the fact that the philosopher and scientists believe that humans have no value. It was not started from ministry but from education by nihilistic scientists. Thats why not everyone is being influence. Because its not at order, its just lectures and teachings. This triggers the Nazis to build a world of their own and decide to kill those human beings.Part CJessicas response1. No, I could be in the perfect virtual reality appliance and not know itNo, I monger be sure Im awakeNo, I cant be sure Im not in the MatrixNo, its a real possibilityI believe that there is a reality independent of my experience, and that it is a real possib ility that we dont have knowledge of this reality. Nevertheless, I believe that it will be possible to behave the skeptics. We will find a way to know were not living in the matrix.You selected the heroic response2. This action at law really intrigued me because for the very first time, it allows me to see reflect about the real world were living in. This activity, too in a way lets me to set things into new perspective and taught me a lesson of learning to decide in and open up to new possibilities although sometimes they contradicts my belief. However, as I was halfway through the activity, I had a funny feeling that this activity was sorry and intrusive because it pervades my original concept of this world. Before this activity, I already have a vivid picture of what Im going to do in the future. Everything seemed impeccable until this activity came along. To say Im living in matrix sounds absurd, near impossible. This is all because what Im doing in the past or right now wor th nothing. After every experience I have been through, be it good or bad, is not genuine, but rather controlled by a ultra-sophisticated machine that inseminate you the experience. In other words, experience is contrived. Whats more, the judgment, ideas, arguments every human has come up with is all formed by this machine, to create the machine thinks is a more vibrant and livable world. I am merely just a character selected by the machine playing in this feisty of life. Whats inside you is just instructions and algorithms that is written by the machine and you just simply adhere it. Even our families and friends arent truly our families and friends, they happened to be the same exactly like me, selected by machine. In this case, essence is prior to existence. The essence itself is skilfully structured out by the machine, they have crafted the future for us. Yes, unless science has proven were not living in a matrix, I am convinced we are living in a virtual reality, plugged into a computer without us even noticing we are being plugged. For one, there are never any 100% absolute truth in a single theory. For instance, some researchers might show that exercise will make you lose weight trance some others disagree. This is to exemplify that there is never a consensus among us human. To deny the fact we are living in a real world and no such possible as matrix is to suggest that we refuse to open up to any possibilities. Truth is, we cant be entirely sure of everything, but rather everything is unsure and not fully been tapped into.Jia Yiis Response No, I could be in the perfect virtual reality machine and not know itYes, I know I am awake.No, I cant be sure Im not inside the matrix.No, Its a real posibility.2. I believe that there is a reality independent of my experience, and that it is a real posibility that we dont have knowledge of this reality. Nevertheless, I believe that it will be possible to answer the sceptics. We will find a way to know were not l iving in the Matrix.You selected the heroic responseFor my opinion, I think this is activity is basically fun. It made me thinks twice of what I am doing now. Somehow, Im having doubts of it. What I did everything for the 19 years of my life, was it worth doing it I even position that was it worth living in this world Somehow, it also made me thought that, was there another world exist that is greater than the world we living in right now This activity made me thought something that I had never thought before. I dont think I could be living in a virtual world. If I am really being controlled by computers, why created so many negative happenings in my life Why always repeating the same thing again and again and again Why do we cry, jape or angry? Why would we have doubts in making a decision or a choice? If we are controlled by computers we shouldnt had emotions and doubts. For example, if you know the game of The Sims, well, its about how we build our virtual characters and build their lives. If its for me, I wouldnt create an unhappy life for my virtual characters. Because its painful. No one controls us but ourselves. We make our own decisions and choices.